I tried, comes the result.

千萬不要用這一家,最近在各個地方發折價的消息,嚴重超買 oversold ,我買的 512 plan,在完全沒有 覆載下測試,原本只是效能差,現在連 Disk IO sucks 都跟著爛掉了,

DamnVPS just make you feel worse than damn it.

XEN RAM 512 PV,and this plan only get one virtual core, the 1G plan get 2 virtual core

[root@www unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2]#cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 26
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2260.998
cache size : 8192 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc up rep_good nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 4521.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

[root@www unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2]#

==============================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
System – Linux www.digez.com 2.6.33.3 #1 SMP Thu May 13 22:30:34 BST 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
/dev/xvda1 15481840 875544 13819864 6% /

Start Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 9 09:25:31 UTC 2010
09:25:31 up 15 min, 1 user, load average: 1.20, 0.45, 0.34

End Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 9 09:36:51 UTC 2010
09:36:51 up 26 min, 1 user, load average: 11.68, 5.21, 2.57


INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 4714790.9 125.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1288.6 155.1
Execl Throughput 188.3 1560.9 82.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 49626.0 185.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 13473.0 125.1
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 415792.0 270.3
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 303484.5 27.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 63447.0 41.1
Process Creation 569.3 3347.0 58.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 402.9 89.9
System Call Overhead 114433.5 269713.0 23.6
=========
FINAL SCORE 83.7

[root@www unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2]#df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/xvda1 15G 856M 14G 6% /
tmpfs 249M 0 249M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev 249M 512K 249M 1% /dev
tmpfs 249M 4.0K 249M 1% /dev/shm
[root@www unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2]#hdparm -tT /dev/xvda1

/dev/xvda1:
Timing cached reads: 12366 MB in 1.99 seconds = 6229.16 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 668 MB in 3.01 seconds = 222.27 MB/sec



VPS 甘苦談


2host 便宜,穩定,可是超賣,效能到了美國上班時間,就會慢下來,網路速度不錯

HazeNET 便宜,效能最好,網路速度不錯,可是一天當機好幾次,我的 VPS 現在還是離線中

Thrust::VPS 便宜,網路速度不錯,可是機車的是 512 RAM 的 node 限制只有一顆 CPU,網路上別人說,unixbench 4.1 跑起來,沒有 200 分的可以丟了,他不到 100 分,不超賣,也不會給你用壓,用了幾天,還蠻穩定的,跟 2host 比起來,算是比較有人管,網路速度,也不錯,分數不高,算是便宜穩定的

ramhost 口碑不錯,可是機車,已經沒有了空的 node 了

Linode 口碑很好,可是價錢很硬,即使很多空的 node 賣不掉,就是不降價

結論就是,2host 加減用,有好的,評估一段時間在跳了,還好,我的系統,整理的ok,搬家打不到幾行指令就搞定